Slave

Posted by

-

slave

slave
Best-selling author and pastor John MacArthur believes
that a mistranslated word has changed the message of the New Testament. He
asserts that the term
servant instead of the term slave has
misconstrued what it means to truly be a follower of Christ.

The following is an excerpt from his new book, Slave:
The Hidden Truth About Your Identity in Christ (Thomas Nelson).

A Word That Changes Everything

Since its first appearance in Antioch, the term Christian
has become the predominant label for those who follow Jesus. It is an
appropriate designation because it rightly focuses on the centerpiece of our
faith: Jesus Christ. Yet ironically, the word itself appears only three times
in the New Testament—twice in the book of Acts and once in 1 Peter 4:16.


In addition to the name Christian, the Bible uses a
hose of other terms to identify the followers of Jesus. Scripture describes us
as children of God, citizens of heaven and lights to the world. We are heirs of
God and joint heirs with Christ, members of His body, sheep in His flock,
ambassadors in His service, and friends around His table. WE are called to
compete like athletes, to fight like soldiers, to abide like branches in a
vine, and even to desire His word as newborn babies long for milk. All of these
descriptions—each in its own unique way—help us understand what it means to be
a Christian.

Yet, the Bible uses one metaphor more frequently than any of
these. It is the word picture you might not expect, yet it is absolutely
critical for understanding what it means to follow Jesus.

It is the image of a slave.

Time and time again throughout the pages of Scripture,
believes are referred to as slaves of God and slaves of Christ.
In fact, whereas the outside world called them “Christians,” the earliest
believers repeatedly referred to themselves in the New Testament as the Lord’s
slaves. For them, the two ideas were synonymous. To be a Christian was to be a
slave of Christ.


The story of the martyrs confirms that this is precisely
what they meant when they declare to their persecutors, “I am a Christian.” A
young man named Apphianus, for example, was imprisoned and tortured by the
Roman authorities. Throughout his trial, he would only reply that he was the
slave of Christ. Though he was finally sentenced to death, and drowned in the
sea, his allegiance to the Lord never wavered.

Other early martyrs responded similarly: “If they consented
to amplify their reply, the perplexity of the magistrates was only the more
increased, for they seemed to speak insoluble enigmas. ‘I am a slave of
Caesar,” they said, ‘but a Christian who has received his liberty from Christ
Himself;’ or contrariwise, ‘I am a free man, the slave of Christ;’ so that it
sometimes happened that it became necessary to send for the proper (the curator
civitatis
) to ascertain the trust as to their civil condition.”

But what proved to be confusing to the Roman authorities
made perfect sense to the martyrs of the early church. Their self-identity had
been radically redefined by the gospel. Whether salve or free in this life,
they had all been set free from sin; yet, having been bought with a price, they
had all becomes slaves of Christ. That is what it meant to be a Christian.

The New Testament reflects this perspective, commanding
believers to submit to Christ completely, and not just as hired servants or
spiritual employees—but a those who belong wholly to Him. We are to obey Him
without question and follow Him without complaint. Jesus Christ is our Master—a
fact we acknowledge every time we call Him “Lord.” We are His slaves, called to
humbly and wholeheartedly obey and honor Him.


We don’t hear about that concept much in churches today. In
contemporary Christianity the language is anything but slave terminology. It is
about success, health, wealth, prosperity and the pursuit of happiness. We
often hear that God loves people unconditionally and wants to be all they want
to be. He wants to fulfill every desire, hope and dream. Personal
ambition, personal fulfillment, personal gratification—these have
all become part of the language of evangelical Christianity—and part of what it
means to have a “personal relationship with Jesus Christ.” Instead of teaching
the New Testament gospel—where sinners are called to submit to Christ, the
contemporary message is exactly the opposite: Jesus is here to fulfill your
wishes. Likening Him to a personal assistant or a personal trainer, many
churchgoers speak of a personal Savior who is each to do their bidding and help
them in their quest for self-satisfaction or individual accomplishment.

The New Testament understanding of the believer’s
relationship to Christ could not be more opposite. He is the Master and Owner.
We are His possession. He is the King, the Lord and the Son of God. We are His
subjects and His subordinates.

In a word, we are His slaves.

Lost in Translation


Scripture’s prevailing description of the Christian’s
relationship to Jesus Christ is the slave/master relationship. But do a casual
read through your English New Testament and you won’t see it.

The reason for this is as simple as it is shocking: the
Greek word for slave has been covered up by being mistranslated in
almost every English version—going back to both the King James Version and the
Geneva Bible that predated it. Though the word slave (doulos in
Greek) appears 124 times in the original test, it is correctly translated only
once in the King James. Most of our modern translations do only slightly
better. It almost seems like a conspiracy.

Instead of translating the word doulos as “slave,”
these translations consistently substitute the word servant in its
place. Ironically, the Greek language has at least half a dozen words that can
mean servant. The word doulos is not one of them. Whenever it is
used, both in the New Testament and in secular Greek literature, it always and
only means slave. According to the Theological Dictionary of the New
Testament
, a foremost authority on the meaning of Greek terms in Scripture,
the word doulos is used exclusively “either to describe the status of
slave or an attitude corresponding to that of a slave.” The dictionary
continues by noting that “the meaning is so unequivocal and self-contained that
it is superfluous to give examples of the individual terms or to trace the
history of the group. … [The] emphasis here is always on ‘serving as a slave.’
Hence we have a service which is not a matter of choice for the one who renders
it, which he has to perform whether he lives it or not, because he is subject
as a slave to an alien will, to the will of his owner. [The term stresses] the
slave’s dependence on his lord.”

While it is true that the duties of slave and servant may
overlap to some degree, there is a key distinction between the two: servants
are hired; slaves are owned. Servants have an element of freedom
in choosing whom they work for and what they do. The idea of servanthood
maintains some level of self-autonomy and personal rights. Slaves, on the other
hand, have no freedom, autonomy or rights. In the Greco-Roman world, slaves
were considered property, to the point that, in the eyes of the law they were
regarded as things rather than persons. To be someone’s slave was
to be his possession, bound to obey his will without hesitation or argument.


But why have modern English translations consistently mistranslated
doulos when its meaning is unmistakable in the Greek? There are at least
two answers to this question. First, given the stigmas attached to slavery in
the Western society, translators have understandably wanted to avoid any
association between biblical teaching and the slave trade of the British Empire
and the American Colonial era. For the average reader today, the word slave
does not conjure up images of Greco-Roman society, but rather depicts an unjust
system of oppression that was finally ended in parliamentary rule in England
and by civil war in the United States. In order to avoid both potential
confusion and negative imagery, modern translators have replaced slave language
with servant language.

Second, from a historical perspective, in late-medieval
times it was common to translate doulos with the Latin word servus.
Some of the earliest English translations, influenced by the Latin version of
the Bible, translated doulos as “servant” because it was a more natural
rendering of servus. Added to this, the term slave in 16th
century England generally depicted someone in physical chains or in prison.
Since this is quite different from the Greco-Roman idea of slavery, the
translators of early English versions (like the Geneva Bible and the King James)
opted for a word they felt better represented Greco-Roman slavery in their
culture. That word was servant. These early translations continue to
have a significant impact on modern English versions.

But whatever the rationale behind the change, something
significant is lost in translation when doulos is rendered “servant”
rather than “slave.” The gospel is not simply an invitation to become Christ’s
associate; it is a mandate to become His slave.

Rediscovering This One Hidden Word


The Bible’s emphasis on slavery to God is missing from the
pages of most modern English translations. But that which is hidden in our
modern versions was a central truth for the apostles and the generations of
believers who came after them.

Early Christian leaders, like Ignatius (who died around AD
110) and his co-workers, saw themselves as “fellow slaves” of Christ. Polycarp
(c. 69-155) instructed the Philippians, “Bind up your loose robes and serve as
God’s slaves in reverential fear and truth.” The Shepherd of Hermas (written
in the second century) warns its readers that “there are many [wicked deeds]
from which the slave of God must refrain.” The fourth-century writer known as
Ambrosiaster explained that “the one who is liberated from [the Mosaic Law]
‘dies’ and lives to God, becoming his slave, purchased by Christ.” Augustine
(354-430) simply asked his congregation this rhetorical question: “Does your
Lord not deserve to have you as his trustworthy slave?” Elsewhere, he rebuked
those who would exhibit foolish pride: “You are a creature, acknowledge the
Creator; you are a slave, do not disdain the Master.” Ancient Bible expositor
John Chrysostom (347-407) comforted those who were in physical bondage with
these words: “In things that relate to Christ, both [slaves and masters] are
equal; and just as you are the slave of Christ, so also is your master.”

Even in more recent history, in spite of the confusion cased
by English translations, leading scholars and pastors have recognized the
reality of this vital concept. Listen to the words of Charles Spurgeon—the
great British preacher of the 19th century: “Where our Authorized [King James]
Version softly puts it ‘servant’ it really is ‘bond-slave.’ The early saints
delighted to count themselves Christ’s absolute property, bought by Him, owned
by Him, and wholly at His disposal. Paul even went so far as to rejoice that he
has the marks of his Master’s brand on him, and he cries, ‘Let on man trouble
me: for I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.’ There was the end of
all debate: he was the Lord’s, and the marks of the scourges, the rods, and the
stones were the broad-arrow of the King which marked Paul’s body as the
property of Jesus the Lord. Now if the saints of old time gloried in obeying
Christ, I pray that you and I … may feel that our first object in life is to
obey our Lord.

Scottish pastor, Alexander Maclaren, a contemporary of
Spurgeon echoed these same truths: “The true position, then, for man is to be
God’s slave. … Absolute submission, unconditional obedience, on the slave’s
part; and on the part of the Master complete ownership, the right of life and
death, the right of disposing of all goods and chattels l.. the right of
issuing commandments without a reason, the right to expect that those
commandments shall be swiftly, unhesitatingly, punctiliously and completely
performed—these things inhere in our relation to God. Blessed [is] the man who
has learned that they do, and has accepted them as his highest glory and the
security of his most blessed life! For, brethren, such submission, absolute and
unconditional, the blending and the absorption of my own will in His will, is
the secret of all that makes manhood glorious and great and happy. … [In] the
New Testament these names of slave and owner are transferred to Christian and
Jesus Christ.”


As these voices from church history make so abundantly
clear, our slavery to Christ has radical implications for how we think and
live. We have been bought with a price. We belong to Christ. We are part
of a people for His own possession. And understanding all of that
changes everything about us, starting with our perspective and our priorities.

True Christianity is not about adding Jesus to my life.
Instead, it is about devoting myself completely to Him—submitting wholly
to His will and seeking to please Him above all else. It demands dying to self
and following the Master, no matter the cost. In other words, to be a Christian
is to be Christ’s slave.

Click here to purchase this book.

+ posts

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top

We Value Your Privacy

By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies. This use includes personalization of content and ads, and traffic analytics. We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalized ads or content, and analyze our traffic. By visiting this site, you consent to our use of cookies.

Read our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.

Copy link